Joe Rogan Tidbit Google Ad Policy

 New Google Ad Policy

Recently Joe Rogan brought up a new Google policy meant for advertising that could control what is posted based on "sensitivity" of current and past events. 

This means Google can take down ads and demonitize companies if they feel like it is sensitive to events such as politics, weather, natural events and terrorism. 

In the verbatim reading, sensitivity is subjective to what Google feels. 

This could include facts on war and conflict, videos of effects of certain laws or platforms, partisan advertising, support for aid for a country,  and the fallout of natural disasters versus media portrayal. 

The potential exists for Google and YouTube to ban ads and videos for certain politcal parties, certain political platforms, religions and churches, companies that sell certain products (firearms) and individuals or podcasts that have certain guests and ad reads. 

Joe was not with it. The policy took effect in February. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Patrick Bet David Effect

Image
 Political Analyst Patrick Bet David Discusses BlackRock and ESG Ratings     Bet David asks what Joe Rogan has heard about BlackRock, Vanguard and other sketchy super-corporations. Joe Replies he has looked into it quite a bit. Bet David mentions that 88% of the S&P 500 companies are owned mostly by Statestreet, BlackRock or Vanguard. 88%!      Bet David begins talking about their influence on military contracts as well. The largest shareholders in many of the defense industry companies are also these same corporations.      Bet David mentions we gave more money to Ukraine than Russia spent on it's defense budget in the same year.      He says only two countries in the world have a GDP bigger than BlackRock, which are America and China.  (He mentions Googling information.)     It seems that BlackRock and Chase were able to demand and win a 400 billion dollar contract on rebuilding Ukraine.     ...
Read more

The Tulsi Gabbard Effect Pt. 2

Image
 The Tulsi Gabbard Effect Part 2 The Military Industrial Complex and Ukraine     Gabbard mentions early in the section that whenever the United States goes to war or even threatens war, it generates a lot of money. She mentions how the cozy relationships between politicians and defense contractors often allocates more funds than the military is asking for to get more money exchanged into the hands of the contractors. She does mention it is also money to keep the military up to date that the pentagon asks for.      It is important to note that in an era where our politicians can't agree on anything and are very far apart on many issues, Republicans and Democrats are both join in supporting the military industrial complex.     Gabbard discusses how the government and media fearmonger into believing there is always an imminent threat so that the money can keep being pumped into conflict instead of  asking if it would help the American peopl...
Read more